Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? :: essays research papers

Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? In the border of intrusive for a research question that has the possibility of encourageing positive results one must find a dependent variable in addition to several(prenominal) free variables that might be a direct cause or a factor in the dependent variable. In observing major governmental elections end-to-end my life I extradite noticed a recurring trend. In many elections one candidate outspends their opponent in an attempt to piss victory. I intend to set up a research design to determine whether independent variables concerning black market contributions have an effect on the outcome of elections. As go finance reform remains a hot topic in congress with legislation such as the McCain-Feinghold Bill, it is important to determine if operate outgo affects the outcome of elections. If the results this question indicate a direct relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variabl e then legislative restrictions might undeniable. If campaign disbursement does not factor in on the outcome of elections, then maybe there is nothing wrong with a candidate out outlay their opponent. Several articles and books have been compose on this subject that I have found useful. According to Ruth S. Jones(1981) These sentiments are often supplemented by a belief that the only right smart a minority party can win is by outspending opponents. Throughout the article Jones focuses in on this trend. If this assumption is true it would indicate that outspending an incumbent is necessary to gain office.The Committee for Economic Development found similar results(1968), Candidates with access to vast personal or family fortunes have a substantial advantage in the interest of high office. This means that a wealthy candidate can in essence buy a victory in an election. This committees research has provided several facts toward my research plan. On the contrary, in an article by G ary C. Jacobsen(1978),spending by challengers has a substantial impact on election outcomes, whereas spending by incumbents has relatively little effect. These findings add another Wrinkle in the process of framing my research design by forcing me to differentiate if spending by incumbents and challengers has a different impact. This article refers to a number of recent studies that found that there is a relationship between how much money is spent and how intimately a candidate does on election day. Throughout the twentieth century events have occurred that indicate that campaign spending in some instances factored in on the results of elections.Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? essays research papersDo Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? In the process of searching for a research question that has the possibility of gaining positive results one must find a dependent variable in addition to several independent var iables that might be a direct cause or a factor in the dependent variable. In observing major political elections throughout my life I have noticed a recurring trend. In many elections one candidate outspends their opponent in an attempt to gain victory. I intend to set up a research design to determine whether independent variables concerning campaign contributions have an effect on the outcome of elections. As campaign finance reform remains a hot topic in congress with legislation such as the McCain-Feinghold Bill, it is important to determine if campaign spending affects the outcome of elections. If the results this question indicate a direct relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable then legislative restrictions might necessary. If campaign spending does not factor in on the outcome of elections, then maybe there is nothing wrong with a candidate outspending their opponent. Several articles and books have been written on this subject that I have found useful. According to Ruth S. Jones(1981) These sentiments are often supplemented by a belief that the only way a minority party can win is by outspending opponents. Throughout the article Jones focuses in on this trend. If this assumption is true it would indicate that outspending an incumbent is necessary to gain office.The Committee for Economic Development found similar results(1968), Candidates with access to vast personal or family fortunes have a substantial advantage in the pursuit of high office. This means that a wealthy candidate can in essence buy a victory in an election. This committees research has provided several facts toward my research plan. On the contrary, in an article by Gary C. Jacobsen(1978),spending by challengers has a substantial impact on election outcomes, whereas spending by incumbents has relatively little effect. These findings add another Wrinkle in the process of framing my research design by forcing me to differentiate if spending by incumben ts and challengers has a different impact. This article refers to a number of recent studies that found that there is a relationship between how much money is spent and how well a candidate does on election day. Throughout the twentieth century events have occurred that indicate that campaign spending in some instances factored in on the results of elections.