The case of injury at the workplace Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The case of psychic trauma at the workplace - Essay ExampleThe case of injury at the workplaceThe complainant appealed the end to the appeal. BWC filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The court govern in favor of BWC holding that Plaintiff had not exhausted administrative remedies and dismissed the appeal. Subsequently, the plaintiff locomote to the Tenth District Court of Appeals which upheld the decision of the trial court. The plaintiff did not stop there hardly made a second Workers Compensation withdraw action with BWC. This second screening was administratively jilted by BWC and Industrial Commission at completely levels. The plaintiff then appealed BWCs decision to the court. At that point, the BWC (hereby called the defendant) made the motion to dismiss or in alternative for summary judgment (the subject to the precede appeal) on grounds that decision of the defendant denying the appliers first action acted as a bar for his making the second appli cation, under the principle of reticuloendothelial system Judicata. Therefore, the main issue in the application was whether the second workers compensation application by the plaintiff can be perceive de novo by BWC or it was barred under the belief of res Judicata.The court found that the second application should have been heard de novo by the defendant. The reasoning of the court was that the original workers compensation claim was not heard on merit but was dismissed on procedural technicalities and, therefore, the doctrine of res Judicata did not apply. ... This second application was administratively rejected by BWC and Industrial Commission at all levels. The plaintiff then appealed BWCs decision to the court. At that point, the BWC (hereby called the defendant) made the motion to dismiss or in alternative for summary judgment (the subject to the present appeal) on grounds that decision of the defendant denying the applicants first application acted as a bar for his makin g the second application, under the doctrine of res Judicata. Therefore, the main issue in the application was whether the second workers compensation application by the plaintiff can be heard de novo by BWC or it was barred under the doctrine of res Judicata. The court found that the second application should have been heard de novo by the defendant. The reasoning of the court was that the original workers compensation claim was not heard on merit but was dismissed on procedural technicalities and, therefore, the doctrine of res Judicata did not apply. The court relied on a decision of the Tenth District Court of Appeals in Greene v Conrad (10th Dist., 1997) where the court held that BWC had denied the application on procedural ground, and which did not constitute adjudication of the dispute on its merits and, therefore, the doctrine of res Judicata could not apply. Therefore, the court dismissed the defendants motion to dismiss and remanded back the matter to BWC for proceedings. The trial court found that the original workers compensation claim application was filed by another person other than the plaintiff with BWC without the knowledge of the plaintiff and therefore, the claim cannot be held to have been adjudicated on merit since he was not pricy as a party. Present Appeal